← Back to all guides

International Courts, Tribunals and European Materials

The ICJ, criminal tribunals, arbitral decisions, the European Union, the ECtHR, and the WTO.

The rest of chapter 10: the standing international courts, the ad hoc tribunals, arbitration, and the European and trade bodies.

The International Court of Justice

The ICJ Reports are organised by year, so they take square brackets. The older PCIJ series is organised by number, so it takes round ones.

r 10.2.1(b) cuts the case name down: drop a leading “The”, and drop “Case” or “Case Concerning”. The uncut version is printed in the guide as an example of what not to write.

Name (Parties) (Phase) [year] ICJ Rep page at [paragraph].

11Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14 at [63].

International criminal tribunals

Give the parties, the phase, the tribunal, the chamber, the case number and the date.

13Prosecutor v Aleksovski (Judgment) ICTY Appeals Chamber IT-95-14/1-A, 24 March 2000 at [63].

Arbitral decisions

Where an arbitration has a case name, the parties go in brackets after it. Where it has none, the parties become the name and are not bracketed (r 10.3.1(b)).

Never write “Case no” before an arbitral case number (r 10.3.2).

Reported
Nicaragua v United States of America (2000) 39 ILM 1539.
Unreported
Abaclat v Argentine Republic ICSID ARB/07/5, 4 August 2011 at [63].

European Union

The case number comes first, with no comma before the name (r 10.5.1(b)(i)). The volume of the European Court Reports attaches to the page, not to the series.

The Reports went digital only in 2012, so there are two forms split at that date. Since then a case carries an ECLI number instead of a volume and page.

15Case C-34/89 Smith v EC Commission [1993] ECR I-454.
Legislation
Regulation 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulations [2002] OJ L248/1.

The European Court of Human Rights

r 10.5 opens by pointing out that the European Union courts and the European Court of Human Rights belong to different institutions under different bodies. They never share a citation form.

17Mauer v Austria (1997) 25 EHRR 91.

The WTO and GATT

Trade panel and Appellate Body reports are cited by title, document number and date, with a description of what the document is in brackets at the end.

19United States – Safeguard Measures on Imports of Fresh, Chilled or Frozen Lamb Meat from New Zealand and Australia WT/DS177/AB/R, 1 May 2001 (Report of the Appellate body).
GATT
Generalized System of Preferences L/7073, 4 September 1992 (Notification by New Zealand).

Last reviewed 6 August 2026